How often does your council say yes?
Householder planning decisions for every council we serve, 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2026, from the government's own statistics. Approval rate, speed, and how each changed on the year before. Free to reuse with a link.
Indicative fee in two minutes. Written fixed-fee quote within 24 hours. Free and without obligation. Nothing to pay until you accept a written fee proposal.
- 91%
- 86%
- 46
- 32,021
What the year to June 2026 tells a homeowner
Householder applications are the ones this practice prepares: extensions, lofts, outbuildings and alterations to a house. National and London figures are for every planning authority in each area; the extremes are from the councils we serve.
91%
of 145,609 householder decisions were approvals. +1.0 pts on the previous year.
86%
across all London planning authorities, 23,973 decisions. +2.1 pts on the year.
98%
Hammersmith and Fulham, 506 decisions.
67%
Barking and Dagenham, 388 decisions.
Of the 46 councils we serve, 11 approved a higher share of householder applications than England as a whole and 35 a lower share. The gap between the most and least permissive council is 31 percentage points, which is a bigger difference than any change in the rules over the same period. Where you live shapes your odds more than what you build.
The largest rise on the year was in Hounslow, up 10.4 points to 78.5%. The largest fall was in Dartford, down 10.7 points to 76.4%.
Speed is a separate question. Barking and Dagenham issued 100% of its householder decisions inside the statutory eight weeks; Camden managed 61%. A council that approves generously but decides slowly still costs you a summer.
Share of householder decisions granted, by council
1 July 2025 to 30 June 2026. Bars start at 50%; the vertical rules mark England and London. Hover or focus a council for its numbers and its change on the year. Every value is in the table below.
- Hammersmith and Fulham97.8%
- Southwark94.8%
- Bexley94.6%
- Broxbourne
- Kensington and Chelsea
- Reigate and Banstead
- Merton
- Tower Hamlets
- Islington
- Wandsworth
- Sutton
- Haringey
- Sevenoaks
- Hemel Hempstead
- Hillingdon
- Lewisham
- Camden
- Woking
- St Albans
- Ealing
- Epsom and Ewell
- Newham
- Brent
- Croydon
- Guildford
- Havering
- Brentwood
- Hackney
- Enfield
- Lambeth
- Richmond upon Thames
- Kingston upon Thames
- Redbridge
- Westminster
- Harrow
- Waltham Forest
- Slough
- Barnet
- Watford
- Bromley
- Hounslow
- Greenwich
- Epping Forest
- Windsor and Maidenhead76.5%
- Dartford76.4%
- Barking and Dagenham66.5%
Share of decisions issued within eight weeks, by council
The statutory period for a householder application is eight weeks from validation. This is the share each council met without an agreed extension of time. Councils that lean on extensions score lower here even when the eventual answer is yes.
- Barking and Dagenham100%
- Bexley99.6%
- Richmond upon Thames98.7%
- Havering
- Southwark
- Brent
- Islington
- Hounslow
- Dartford
- Redbridge
- Ealing
- Epping Forest
- Windsor and Maidenhead
- Reigate and Banstead
- Epsom and Ewell
- Newham
- Croydon
- Barnet
- Lewisham
- Sutton
- Watford
- Greenwich
- Harrow
- Sevenoaks
- Lambeth
- Hillingdon
- Brentwood
- Kingston upon Thames
- Tower Hamlets
- Enfield
- Kensington and Chelsea
- Wandsworth
- Haringey
- Hackney
- Bromley
- Waltham Forest
- Broxbourne
- Woking
- Hammersmith and Fulham
- St Albans
- Hemel Hempstead
- Guildford
- Merton
- Slough72.4%
- Westminster66.1%
- Camden60.8%
46 councils, alphabetically
Current period 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2026; change is against 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2025. Click a council for its area page, constraints and typical routes.
| Council | Decisions | Granted | Refused | Approval rate | Change | Within 8 weeks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barking and DagenhamLondon | 388 | 258 | 130 | 66.5% | −9.4 pts | 100.0% |
| BarnetLondon | 1,361 | 1,091 | 270 | 80.2% | −2.2 pts | 95.2% |
| BexleyLondon | 877 | 830 | 47 | 94.6% | +2.1 pts | 99.6% |
| BrentLondon | 879 | 761 | 118 | 86.6% | +5.9 pts | 97.4% |
| BrentwoodEast of England | 429 | 367 | 62 | 85.5% | −0.7 pts | 93.2% |
| BromleyLondon | 1,609 | 1,264 | 345 | 78.6% | +0.5 pts | 90.2% |
| BroxbourneEast of England | 287 | 269 | 18 | 93.7% | +6.2 pts | 89.9% |
| CamdenLondon | 394 | 351 | 43 | 89.1% | +2.3 pts | 60.8% |
| CroydonLondon | 786 | 681 | 105 | 86.6% | +3.2 pts | 95.3% |
| DartfordSouth East | 368 | 281 | 87 | 76.4% | −10.7 pts | 97.0% |
| EalingLondon | 946 | 825 | 121 | 87.2% | −2.3 pts | 96.0% |
| EnfieldLondon | 934 | 779 | 155 | 83.4% | +2.0 pts | 92.5% |
| Epping ForestEast of England | 756 | 579 | 177 | 76.6% | +3.2 pts | 95.8% |
| Epsom and EwellSouth East | 411 | 357 | 54 | 86.9% | −2.4 pts | 95.5% |
| GreenwichLondon | 624 | 481 | 143 | 77.1% | +5.2 pts | 94.7% |
| GuildfordSouth East | 859 | 742 | 117 | 86.4% | −0.5 pts | 77.3% |
| HackneyLondon | 415 | 351 | 64 | 84.6% | −0.5 pts | 90.3% |
| Hammersmith and FulhamLondon | 506 | 495 | 11 | 97.8% | +0.5 pts | 86.9% |
| HaringeyLondon | 689 | 622 | 67 | 90.3% | +0.2 pts | 90.4% |
| HarrowLondon | 917 | 749 | 168 | 81.7% | +1.6 pts | 94.5% |
| HaveringLondon | 985 | 846 | 139 | 85.9% | +5.1 pts | 97.7% |
| Hemel HempsteadDacorum · East of England | 676 | 610 | 66 | 90.2% | +0.9 pts | 84.1% |
| HillingdonLondon | 1,147 | 1,035 | 112 | 90.2% | +4.3 pts | 94.0% |
| HounslowLondon | 689 | 541 | 148 | 78.5% | +10.4 pts | 97.2% |
| IslingtonLondon | 337 | 312 | 25 | 92.6% | +0.8 pts | 97.3% |
| Kensington and ChelseaLondon | 664 | 622 | 42 | 93.7% | +0.6 pts | 92.0% |
| Kingston upon ThamesLondon | 742 | 616 | 126 | 83.0% | +4.2 pts | 92.9% |
| LambethLondon | 595 | 496 | 99 | 83.4% | +3.1 pts | 94.1% |
| LewishamLondon | 578 | 517 | 61 | 89.4% | 0.0 pts | 95.2% |
| MertonLondon | 759 | 705 | 54 | 92.9% | +4.4 pts | 74.6% |
| NewhamLondon | 388 | 337 | 51 | 86.9% | +5.2 pts | 95.4% |
| RedbridgeLondon | 991 | 821 | 170 | 82.8% | +0.6 pts | 96.3% |
| Reigate and BansteadSouth East | 581 | 543 | 38 | 93.5% | +4.0 pts | 95.6% |
| Richmond upon ThamesLondon | 1,302 | 1,085 | 217 | 83.3% | +2.7 pts | 98.7% |
| SevenoaksSouth East | 641 | 579 | 62 | 90.3% | +0.2 pts | 94.3% |
| SloughSouth East | 405 | 328 | 77 | 81.0% | −2.8 pts | 72.4% |
| SouthwarkLondon | 558 | 529 | 29 | 94.8% | +0.7 pts | 97.5% |
| St AlbansEast of England | 980 | 856 | 124 | 87.3% | +1.9 pts | 84.5% |
| SuttonLondon | 601 | 552 | 49 | 91.8% | +2.3 pts | 95.1% |
| Tower HamletsLondon | 191 | 177 | 14 | 92.7% | +4.6 pts | 92.7% |
| Waltham ForestLondon | 771 | 628 | 143 | 81.5% | +8.7 pts | 90.1% |
| WandsworthLondon | 977 | 898 | 79 | 91.9% | +0.2 pts | 90.9% |
| WatfordEast of England | 304 | 243 | 61 | 79.9% | −1.1 pts | 94.9% |
| WestminsterLondon | 366 | 300 | 66 | 82.0% | +1.9 pts | 66.1% |
| Windsor and MaidenheadSouth East | 850 | 650 | 200 | 76.5% | +7.9 pts | 95.8% |
| WokingSouth East | 508 | 445 | 63 | 87.6% | +10.3 pts | 88.6% |
| London, all planning authorities | 23,973 | 20,562 | 3,411 | 85.8% | +2.1 pts | 93.4% |
| England | 145,609 | 131,707 | 13,902 | 90.5% | +1.0 pts | 92.6% |
Where the numbers come from
Every figure is derived from the District planning application statistics (PS2), open data table, published by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government with the quarterly Planning applications in England release and reused here under the Open Government Licence v3.0. We take the four most recent quarters for each planning authority and sum them, so the period is a rolling year ending on the last published quarter. The latest quarter is provisional until the next release. We retrieved the table on 24 September 2026.
"(Other) householder developments": planning applications by householders for works to a house and its curtilage. Decisions are granted plus refused; withdrawn and undetermined applications are excluded. "Within 8 weeks" is the share of decisions (excluding those covered by a planning performance agreement or agreed extension) issued inside the statutory 8-week period.
Hemel Hempstead is shown against its planning authority, Dacorum. London and England totals cover every district planning authority in each area, including councils we do not serve.
How to read it, and how not to
An approval rate is not the probability that your application will be approved. It describes what a council decided on the applications it received, and applicants who take advice tend to withdraw or redesign weak schemes before a decision. A low rate can mean a strict council, or a borough where many people apply for things that were never going to pass. It is a signal about how much care the drawings and the planning statement need, not a verdict on your project.
Speed within eight weeks measures the statutory clock only. Councils increasingly ask applicants to agree an extension of time; those decisions are excluded from this measure, which is why a council can look slow here yet report strong performance on the government's own dashboard, where agreed extensions count as on time.
Citing this page
Use the figures freely with a link to this page. The CSV and JSON carry the same numbers with the previous period alongside, so a comparison can be reproduced. The page is regenerated after each quarterly release; the underlying table and the retrieval date are recorded above so a citation stays checkable.
Ready to move forward?
Answer six questions and your indicative fee arrives on screen and by email. Written fixed-fee quote within 24 hours.
- 15+ years’ experience
- 200+ planning applications
- One designer, survey to decision
- Our approval commitment
Free and without obligation. Nothing to pay until you accept a written fee proposal.

